In products liability, what occurs if a product has moved through the normal channels of distribution?

In a products liability case, if a product has moved through the normal channels of distribution, it implies that a defect existed when the product left the defendant's control. This is generally based on the theory of strict liability, which holds manufacturers and sellers responsible for placing a defective product into the stream of commerce, regardless of whether they were negligent. The rationale is that once the product has been distributed through the proper channels, the manufacturer is in a better position to ensure the safety of the product, and any defect that causes harm can typically be traced back to their control prior to distribution. Thus, if a product poses a danger to the consumer after it has moved through these channels, it is often inferred that the defect was present before it reached the consumer's hands.

The other options present alternative interpretations of liability which do not align with the established principles in products liability. For example, presuming negligence applies a different standard and is not the default assumption in strict liability claims. Similarly, mishandling suggests that the defect arose due to actions taken after the product left the manufacturer, shifting emphasis away from inherent defects. Lastly, the idea of transferring liability to the retailer misunderstands the framework of responsibility which primarily rests on the manufacturer unless a specific relationship or situation is