Which of the following best describes "outrageous conduct" necessary for intentional infliction of emotional distress?

The correct description of "outrageous conduct" necessary for establishing intentional infliction of emotional distress is that it must be extreme and intolerable. This standard reflects the severity of the behavior required to meet the legal threshold for this tort. Courts look for conduct that goes beyond the bounds of decency expected in a civilized society. Such actions are often characterized by a blatant disregard for the victim's feelings or dignity, and they evoke a strong emotional reaction.

Examples of outrageous conduct might include persistent harassment, threats, or actions that shame or humiliate an individual in an egregious manner. The law requires that the conduct be so extreme that it shocks the conscience of a reasonable person, distinguishing it clearly from more ordinary offensive or annoying behaviors.

In contrast, conduct that is mildly offensive or causes minimal inconvenience does not reach the level of outrage necessary for this type of claim. Additionally, actions that are legal but socially frowned upon typically do not meet the threshold for intentional infliction of emotional distress either, as they lack the requisite extreme and intolerable nature.