Which of the following best describes "trespass to land"?

The option that best describes "trespass to land" is indeed the one that states it is an unlawful entry onto another person's land without permission. This legal concept is firmly rooted in property law, which recognizes the right of individuals to control access to their land. Trespass can occur even if no physical damage is done to the property; simply entering the land without permission constitutes a trespass. The critical factor here is the lack of consent from the property owner, which distinguishes trespass from situations that might involve property damage or use without consent but do not include a direct physical entry onto the land itself.

In contrast, the other options describe different situations that do not fit the strict definition of trespass to land. Leaving personal property on someone else's land does not involve an entry and could instead be categorized under other legal theories, such as conversion or nuisance, depending on the context. Using someone else's land for personal gain may involve unauthorized occupation or use, but it doesn't necessarily constitute entry as required for trespass. Lastly, damage caused to land by a trespasser reflects the consequences of trespass rather than the act itself, which is fundamentally about the entry onto the land without permission. Each of these distinctions is crucial in understanding the nuances of property law