Which of the following is NOT a defense to an intentional tort?

Negligence is the correct answer as it is not considered a defense to an intentional tort. In the context of tort law, intentional torts are wrongful acts committed with intent to cause harm, such as assault, battery, or false imprisonment. Defenses to these torts typically involve justifications or excuses for the conduct.

Consent allows a defendant to argue that the plaintiff permitted the harmful action, thereby eliminating liability. Self-defense permits the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from imminent harm, justified by the necessity of the situation. Withdrawal, where a person ceases their participation in an act before harm occurs, can also serve as a defense by showing that the intent to harm was abandoned.

Negligence, on the other hand, pertains to unintentional conduct where there is a failure to exercise a reasonable standard of care, leading to harm. It does not apply to intentional torts since the hallmark of these claims is the deliberate nature of the act. Therefore, negligence cannot serve as a defense to an accusation of an intentional tort.