Which of the following is true of strict liability in terms of product use incidental to services?

In the context of strict liability relating to products used in conjunction with services, it is generally true that strict liability is not applicable in most circumstances. Strict liability tends to focus on the manufactured products themselves – for instance, if a product is defective and causes harm, the manufacturer may be held liable even if they were not negligent. However, when it comes to products that are used incidentally to the provision of a service, courts often apply a different standard, leaning towards negligence rather than strict liability.

This principle is largely rooted in the idea that when a service is being provided, the focus is on the service rendered rather than just the product itself. Products that are part of a service may be subject to scrutiny under a negligence standard, which involves evaluating whether the provider acted with a reasonable standard of care in using the product, as opposed to simply determining if there was a defect in the product itself.

The remaining options suggest broader or more absolute frameworks for strict liability that do not align with established legal principles in the context of services. Therefore, understanding the nuanced relationship between products and services helps clarify why the correct answer highlights the limited applicability of strict liability in these situations.